Strategy—a word that means something different to nearly everyone you ask. For some, it’s the counterpart to tactics: where tactical thinking drills down into the details, strategy soars at 30,000 feet, painting the big picture. Others view it more pragmatically as simply another word for “plan.” And then there are those who’ve seen it reduced to a corporate ritual: that Microsoft Word template used to rubber-stamp decisions already made in the C-suite.

At its foundation, Enterprise Architecture serves as the bridge between business outcomes and IT investments. This bridging function necessarily requires business strategy as its cornerstone—but here’s where things get interesting. When I mention “business strategy,” you might envision a formal document, complete with carefully crafted vision statements, missions, goals, and cascading objectives. Or perhaps you think of something less structured but equally powerful: the core idea that captures both destination and journey. Either way, as Enterprise Architects, we expect to have this strategic foundation. Yet for many of us, it remains an elusive target, never quite matching our expectations.

The role of IT in corporate strategy typically falls into one of two camps. In companies with deeper roots—say, those over 40 years old—technology often remains an afterthought. This persists despite the obvious reality that today’s businesses, regardless of size, cannot function without technology. The old mindset of “IT as the department that handles computers” stubbornly lingers. In contrast, younger organizations often embrace technology as a core strategic component from day one, weaving IT directly into their business strategy.

In this series, we’re embarking on a winding journey through the landscape of strategy. We’ll explore its highest principles through compelling examples from both military and business history—from Napoleon’s battlefield brilliance to Schwarzkopf’s modern warfare, from Walmart’s retail dominance to Cisco’s technological innovation. Along the way, we’ll examine the warning signs and organizational barriers that can derail even the most promising strategic initiatives.

Before we dive deeper, let’s get crystal clear on what I mean by “strategy.” It’s particularly important since I started by pointing out how this word means something different to everyone – and boy, has business-speak gone wild with it. These days, slap a discount on your product? Congratulations, you’ve got a “low-price strategy.” Send some emails? That’s your “marketing strategy.” Process a few spreadsheets? Welcome to your “IT strategy” (I’m guilty as charged on that last one, and yes, I’m cringing).

The term has been so overused and misused that Harvard Business Review dedicated the first seven pages of their strategy manifesto just explaining what strategy isn’t. That should tell you something.

So, for this series, here’s my stake in the ground: strategy is a careful plan or method comprising three essential elements – a diagnosis, a guiding policy, and coherent actions. If you’re thinking “my strategy is to never quit until I win,” we’re going to have to park that conversation until we do a deep dive into motivational speaking.

Time to let you get back to your scrolling – I can feel the Instagram reels calling your name. Coming up next, we’ll dive into how to spot a strategy that’s more holes than Swiss cheese, setting us up for some epic tales of David-versus-Goliath victories where solid strategy helped the underdogs triumph. Stay tuned – this is where it gets really interesting. Catch you on the flip side! ~Ciao

4 responses to “The Strategy Conundrum Part 1: Where Enterprise Architecture Meets Business Reality”

  1. Very informative and a good read. We need more forward thinking people in our industry with a vision to see the future. We are always surrounded by people with the best new idea for a price (sales). It’s hard to see through the trees for the reality of what’s needed.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thank you for your thoughtful comment! You’ve touched on something really important – the difference between genuine forward thinking and simply chasing the next sales pitch. It can be challenging to filter through all the ‘innovative solutions’ being marketed to find what truly adds value. Having a clear vision helps cut through the noise and focus on meaningful improvements that actually serve our industry’s needs. Your point about seeing through the trees to reality is spot-on – it’s about understanding the fundamental challenges we need to solve, not just jumping at every shiny new tool or service. Thanks for adding this valuable perspective to the discussion!

      Like

  2. Verry good points made. I think though like you said strategy does have many meanings. And many of the specific forms and documents you mentioned are more components of a strategy than being completely stand alone tools on their own.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. You’ve hit on a crucial distinction! Documents can either be lifeless paperwork that people grudgingly complete, or they can be vital roadmaps that align everyone’s efforts toward shared goals. The key difference often lies in how leadership implements and reinforces them – when treated as meaningful guides rather than mere formalities, documents help ensure consistent execution and keep everyone moving in the same direction. It’s all about making them practical tools rather than bureaucratic hurdles.

      Like

Leave a reply to Dave Cancel reply

Trending